Cross-sectional study demonstrates validity of Basque health questionnaires in chronic disease patients, suggesting reliable clinical utility.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) tools are limited resources in Basque, co-official language in Basque Autonomous Community, Spain. The aim of this study was to translate and adapt Basque Barthel Index (BI) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and to validate them along with Basque EQ-5D-5L. A cross-sectional observational study was carried out to assess the psychometric properties of Basque questionnaires. We recruited Basque speaking adults suffering from diabetes mellitus, heart failure, respiratory or musculoskeletal diseases and a convenience sample (overall n = 347) via post mail, all of them covered by the Galdakao-Usansolo University Hospital. Participants were classified depending on the number of comorbidities and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). BI and PHQ-9 were translated to Basque and back-translated to Spanish and English, respectively. Basque EQ-5D-5L was already available. The comprehensibility and feasibility of instruments were evaluated by cognitive debriefing interviews. Reliability (Cronbach’s alpha), factor analysis, convergent validity and known-groups validity were assessed. Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.93 for BI, 0.85 for EQ-5D-5L and 0.89 for PHQ-9. Each tool fit into its own single dimension. Three questionnaires correlated independently (each one’s ρ > 0.4, p < .0001) with the physical component (PCS) of Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) and the PHQ-9 with the mental component (MCS) of SF-36, confirming the convergent validity. All the instruments detected differences depending on the number of comorbidities or CCI, demonstrating the known-groups validity. Basque BI, EQ-5D-5L and PHQ-9 are reliable and valid tools that satisfy the psychometric quality requirements for use in clinical practice and research studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mestre et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: