Key result
Intra-arterial tenecteplase after endovascular recanalisation fails to improve 90-day freedom from disability vs standard care.
Why the study?
Does intra-arterial tenecteplase improve freedom from disability at 90 days in patients with acute posterior circulation arterial occlusion after successful endovascular recanalisation?
RCT (n=208)
randomly allocated
Yes
Does intra-arterial tenecteplase improve freedom from disability at 90 days in patients with acute posterior circulation arterial occlusion after successful endovascular recanalisation?
Intra-arterial tenecteplase administered after successful recanalisation of acute posterior circulation occlusion did not significantly improve freedom from disability or mortality at 90 days.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether intra-arterial tenecteplase administered after successful endovascular recanalisation improves outcomes in patients with acute arterial occlusion of the posterior circulation. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 31 hospitals in China, 24 January 2023 to 24 August 2023. PARTICIPANTS: 208 patients with successful recanalisation (grade 2b50-3 on the extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale) of an occlusion in the V4 segment of the vertebral artery; proximal, middle, or distal segment of the basilar artery; or P1 segment of the posterior cerebral artery: 104 were randomly allocated to receive tenecteplase and 104 to receive standard care. INTERVENTIONS: Intra-arterial tenecteplase (0.0625 mg/kg, maximum dose 6.25 mg) administered proximal to the residual thrombus (if still present) or distal to the origin of the main pontine perforator branches over 15 seconds, or endovascular treatment only (control group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was freedom from disability (modified Rankin scale score 0 or 1) at 90 days after randomisation. Primary safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 36 hours and all cause mortality at 90 days. All efficacy and safety analyses were conducted by intention to treat and adjusted for age, pre-stroke modified Rankin scale score, time from onset of moderate to severe stroke (National Institutes of Health stroke scale score ≥6) to randomisation, hypertension, and baseline stroke severity. RESULTS: 28 (26.9%), adjusted risk ratio 1.13, 0.73 to 1.74. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 36 hours occurred in eight patients (8.3%) in the tenecteplase group and three (3.1%) in the control group (adjusted risk ratio 3.09, 0.78 to 12.20). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to acute posterior large or proximal vessel occlusion, intra-arterial tenecteplase administered after successful recanalisation was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in combined disability and mortality at 90 days. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05684172.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in acute posterior circulation arterial occlusion (n=208). Intra-arterial tenecteplase vs. standard care was evaluated on freedom from disability (modified Rankin scale score 0 or 1) at 90 days after randomisation (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.73-1.74). Intra-arterial tenecteplase after successful endovascular recanalisation did not significantly improve freedom from disability at 90 days compared to standard care (RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.73-1.74).
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: