Key result
Real-time triplane echocardiography correlates more strongly with 3D full volume LVEF than Biplane Simpson.
Why the study?
Biplane Simpson has known limitations for measuring LVEF that might be overcome by 3D real-time triplane echocardiography, which acquires apical views simultaneously in the same cardiac cycle.
Does 3D real-time triplane echocardiography improve the correlation of LVEF and LV volume estimation with 3D LV full volume compared to Biplane Simpson in patients with STEMI?
Cross-Sectional (n=52)
Blinded to clinical and angiographic data
No
Does 3D real-time triplane echocardiography improve the correlation of LVEF and LV volume estimation with 3D LV full volume compared to Biplane Simpson in patients with STEMI?
Real-time triplane echocardiography provides a more accurate estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction than Biplane Simpson when compared to 3D echocardiography in patients with STEMI.
Real-time triplane may improve LVEF correlation versus biplane Simpson in STEMI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Purpose : The Biplane Simpson (BPS) remains the recommended 2-dimensional method to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, it has known limitations that may be overcome with 3D real-time triplane (RTTP), for instance, obtaining all apical views simultaneously at the same cardiac cycle. Accurate LVEF measurement is of utmost importance, as it guides the allocation of many treatments that reduce morbidity and mortality in heart failure. We sought to compare LVEF and volumes assessed by BPS and RTTP, using 3D LV full volume as reference, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods and results : Prospective study that included consecutive STEMI patients. LV volumes and EF were compared between BPS and RTTP and the reference method. Fifty-two patients were studied and anterior MI was the most frequent location (44%). There was strong correlation between EF measured by BPS (r=0.80, p<0.001) and RTTP (r=0.91, p<0.001) versus the reference method, with significant difference between coefficients (0.11, p=0.034). EF by BPS attained a good inter-operator agreement, with an intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.82 (95% CI 0.710-0.894,p<0.001), as well as EF by RTTP (ICC 0.88, 95% CI 0.801–0.930,p<0.001), without statistically significant difference between the two methods (p=0.279). Conclusion : Estimation of LV volumes and EF by RTTP method showed higher correlation than BPS with 3D-echocardiography, in a population of STEMI patients. As an accurate LVEF estimation is of high relevance for its potential to alter clinical decision pathways, this data points to the usefulness of the RTTP method, especially in myocardial infarction setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bras et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=52). 3D Real-time triplane (RTTP) echocardiography vs. 2D Biplane Simpson (BPS) echocardiography was evaluated on Correlation of LVEF with 3D LV full volume reference (r coefficient) (Difference in r 0.11, p=0.034). Real-time triplane echocardiography showed a significantly higher correlation with 3D full volume for left ventricular ejection fraction estimation than Biplane Simpson (r=0.91 vs r=0.80, p=0.034).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: