Key result
CAC > 0 is linked to ~4-fold greater cardiac event risk in asymptomatic working-age adults.
Why the study?
The CAC score is primarily used in asymptomatic intermediate-risk individuals when statin initiation or prevention intensification is uncertain, prompting an evaluation of its predictive value in working-age adults.
Does the Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) score predict incident CVD events and mortality in asymptomatic working-age adults?
Systematic Review (n=105,276)
Does the Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) score predict incident CVD events and mortality in asymptomatic working-age adults?
The CAC score effectively predicts incident CVD events and all-cause mortality in asymptomatic working-age adults, demonstrating higher discriminatory power than traditional risk scores in some studies.
Supports CAC scoring for risk stratification in asymptomatic working-age adults; extends prior associations via systematic review.
The Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) score is primarily used in asymptomatic individuals at intermediate risk for developing cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly when there is uncertainty whether to initiate statins or intensify primary prevention measures. In this systematic review, we examined the value of the CAC score as a predictor of incident CVD events and mortality among asymptomatic working-age adults. We reviewed studies published from November 2009 to December 2022 examining asymptomatic adults 18-65 years of age. A total of 908 studies were identified. After the elimination of 578 and 326 studies based on abstract and full-text review, respectively, we examined four studies that met the inclusion criteria. Two of the studies showed that any CAC score above zero was associated with a four- to fivefold increased risk of incident cardiac events. In addition, we found that increasing CAC score was associated with a higher risk of incident cardiac events and/or all-cause mortality in a dose-response relationship documenting a strong criterion of causality. Furthermore, one of the studies elicited a higher discriminatory power of the CAC score compared to the Framingham and the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk scores in distinguishing high-risk from intermediate-risk individuals for all-cause mortality. Our review showed that the CAC score is predictive of elevated risk for incident CVD events and mortality among asymptomatic working-age adults. However, prospective studies are warranted to perform cost-benefit analyses on the utility of CAC scoring as a screening tool in the general population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charalambous et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Asymptomatic working-age adults at risk for cardiovascular disease (n=105,276). Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) score > 0 vs. CAC score = 0 was evaluated on Incident cardiovascular disease events and mortality. Any Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) score above zero was associated with a four- to fivefold increased risk of incident cardiac events compared to a score of zero in asymptomatic working-age adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: