Key result
Unwitnessed stroke onset shows no difference in 90-day functional outcomes vs witnessed onset after thrombectomy.
Why the study?
Does unwitnessed onset of stroke compared to witnessed onset affect the modified Rankin Scale shift at 90 days in patients with large-vessel occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy in the extended time window?
Cohort (n=2,073)
Yes
Does unwitnessed onset of stroke compared to witnessed onset affect the modified Rankin Scale shift at 90 days in patients with large-vessel occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy in the extended time window?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the extended time window, patients with unwitnessed large-vessel occlusion stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy have similar likelihoods of favorable outcomes compared to those with witnessed onset.
BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether outcomes of patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy with large-vessel occlusion and unwitnessed onset of stroke differ from those with witnessed onset in the extended time window. METHODS: We enrolled patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion (internal carotid artery, M1, or M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery) undergoing endovascular thrombectomy within 6 to 24 hours from the time last seen well, from 2014 to 2022, at 66 sites in Europe, North America, and Asia. Patients with a prestroke modified Rankin Scale score of >3 or age <18 were excluded. We categorized patients by onset mode as witnessed or unwitnessed. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale shift at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were functional independence, a composite of functional independence or return of Rankin to prestroke level, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, mortality, and a composite of severe disability or mortality at 90 days. We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting to compare outcomes between the groups. RESULTS: Of 5098 patients assessed for eligibility, we included 2073, of whom 1760 (84.9%) had unwitnessed onset, and 313 (15.1%) were witnessed. In the univariate comparison (before inverse probability of treatment weighting), 38.8% of the unwitnessed and 45.7% of the witnessed patients achieved functional independence ( P =0.022). Mortality was 21.6% among unwitnessed and 22.0% among witnessed ( P =0.847), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates were 6.6% and 5.8%, respectively ( P =0.623). The primary outcome (modified Rankin Scale shift) showed no difference comparing unwitnessed to witnessed patients (odds ratio, 1.35 [95% CI, 0.82–2.20]; P =0.235) in the inverse probability of treatment weighting. Unwitnessed patients were more likely to achieve functional independence or return of Rankin (1.53 [1.01–2.33]; P =0.045). Other secondary outcomes did not differ between the witnessed and unwitnessed patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the extended time window, unwitnessed patients with large-vessel occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy have at least the same likelihood of favorable outcomes as witnessed patients. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04096248.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomppo et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion stroke (n=2,073). Unwitnessed onset of stroke vs. Witnessed onset of stroke was evaluated on modified Rankin Scale shift at 90 days (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.82-2.20, p=0.235). Unwitnessed stroke onset showed no difference in 90-day modified Rankin Scale shift compared to witnessed onset in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (OR 1.35; 95% CI 0.82-2.20; P=0.235).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: