Population
Simulated and real heart rate (HR) signals
Comparison
Lomb method for power spectral density estimation vs Classical power spectral density estimators…
Design
Other
Key result
The Lomb method avoided the low-pass effect of resampling seen in classical methods, proving more suitable than fast Fourier transform for power spectral density estimation of heart rate signals.
Authors
Loading...
May favor Lomb for accurate HRV spectral analysis; leaves open clinical validation before routine use.
The Lomb method is superior to classical methods with interpolation for estimating the power spectral density of unevenly sampled heart rate signals for heart rate variability analysis.
Laguna et al. (1998) studied Heart rate variability. Lomb method vs. Fast Fourier transform or autoregressive estimate with interpolation was evaluated on Power spectral density estimation performance. The Lomb method avoided the low-pass effect of resampling seen in classical methods, proving more suitable than fast Fourier transform for power spectral density estimation of heart rate signals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: