State-sponsored child separation as a method of cultural genocide and parental control has a long history around the world. While some may view this only as a historical occurrence, Russian actions in Ukraine and the previous U.S. policy of child separation at its southern border as a deterrent to seeking asylum are contemporary occurrences. Lessons from other countries in the Americas, Africa, and Asia are presented to illustrate the inherent human rights violations of these actions. The implications of cultural genocide are viewed through the lens of applicable United Nations conventions. Ethical implications are presented with actions to ensure the fulfillment of these human rights.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mapp et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: