The Non-linear Framingham Stroke Risk Score significantly improved 10-year stroke risk prediction compared to the Revised Framingham Stroke Risk Score, achieving a c-statistic of 87.43% versus 73.74%.
Cohort (n=21,912)
Stroke (n=21,912)
Non-linear Framingham Stroke Risk Score (N-SRS) vs Revised Framingham Stroke Risk Score (R-FSRS)
c-statistic (AUC) for 10-year stroke risk prediction (0.85-0.90)
Absolute Event Rate: 87.43% vs 73.74%
Current stroke risk assessment tools presume the impact of risk factors is linear and cumulative. However, both novel risk factors and their interplay influencing stroke incidence are difficult to reveal using traditional additive models. The goal of this study was to improve upon the established Revised Framingham Stroke Risk Score and design an interactive Non-Linear Stroke Risk Score. Leveraging machine learning algorithms, our work aimed at increasing the accuracy of event prediction and uncovering new relationships in an interpretable fashion. A two-phase approach was used to create our stroke risk prediction score. First, clinical examinations of the Framingham offspring cohort were utilized as the training dataset for the predictive model. Optimal Classification Trees were used to develop a tree-based model to predict 10-year risk of stroke. Unlike classical methods, this algorithm adaptively changes the splits on the independent variables, introducing non-linear interactions among them. Second, the model was validated with a multi-ethnicity cohort from the Boston Medical Center. Our stroke risk score suggests a key dichotomy between patients with history of cardiovascular disease and the rest of the population. While it agrees with known findings, it also identified 23 unique stroke risk profiles and highlighted new non-linear relationships; such as the role of T-wave abnormality on electrocardiography and hematocrit levels in a patient's risk profile. Our results suggested that the non-linear approach significantly improves upon the baseline in the c-statistic (training 87.43% (CI 0.85-0.90) vs. 73.74% (CI 0.70-0.76); validation 75.29% (CI 0.74-0.76) vs 65.93% (CI 0.64-0.67), even in multi-ethnicity populations. The clinical implications of the new risk score include prioritization of risk factor modification and personalized care at the patient level with improved targeting of interventions for stroke prevention.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Agni Orfanoudaki
University of Oxford
Emma Chesley
Emma Kinderziekenhuis
Christian Cadisch
ETH Zurich
PLoS ONE
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Hartford Financial Services (United States)
Hartford Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Orfanoudaki et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Stroke (n=21,912). Non-linear Framingham Stroke Risk Score (N-SRS) vs. Revised Framingham Stroke Risk Score (R-FSRS) was evaluated on c-statistic (AUC) for 10-year stroke risk prediction (95% CI 0.85-0.90). The Non-linear Framingham Stroke Risk Score significantly improved 10-year stroke risk prediction compared to the Revised Framingham Stroke Risk Score, achieving a c-statistic of 87.43% versus 73.74%.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f52ec8090e499da5faea1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232414
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: