Key result
Patients remaining in sinus rhythm 6 months after pulmonary vein isolation had a significantly higher concentration of phase singularities in the pulmonary veins compared to those with recurrence (10.20% vs 5.19%).
Why the study?
PVI is effective for AF, but not all patients benefit, prompting evaluation of ECGI to identify reentries and relate PV rotor density to PVI outcome.
Does the distribution of reentrant activity detected by ECGI predict clinical outcome after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=29)
No
Does the distribution of reentrant activity detected by ECGI predict clinical outcome after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 10.2% vs 5.19%
p-value: p=0.011
Non-invasive ECGI mapping of phase singularities in the pulmonary veins can help predict the clinical success of pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the most successful treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) nowadays. However, not all AF patients benefit from PVI. In this study, we evaluate the use of ECGI to identify reentries and relate rotor density in the pulmonary vein (PV) area as an indicator of PVI outcome. Rotor maps were computed in a set of 29 AF patients using a new rotor detection algorithm. The relationship between the distribution of reentrant activity and the clinical outcome after PVI was studied. The number of rotors and proportion of PSs in different atrial regions were computed and compared retrospectively in two groups of patients: patients that remained in sinus rhythm 6 months after PVI and patients with arrhythmia recurrence. The total number of rotors obtained was higher in patients returning to arrhythmia after the ablation (4.31 ± 2.77 vs. 3.58 ± 2.67%, p = 0.018). However, a significantly higher concentration of PSs in the pulmonary veins was found in patients that remained in sinus rhythm (10.20 ± 12.40% vs. 5.19 ± 9.13%, p = 0.011) 6 months after PVI. The results obtained show a direct relationship between the expected AF mechanism and the electrophysiological parameters provided by ECGI, suggesting that this technology offers relevant information to predict the clinical outcome after PVI in AF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fambuena-Santos et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=29). Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI) mapping prior to Pulmonary Vein Isolation vs. Arrhythmia recurrence vs non-recurrence was evaluated on Concentration of phase singularities (PSs) in the pulmonary veins (p=0.011). Patients remaining in sinus rhythm 6 months after pulmonary vein isolation had a significantly higher concentration of phase singularities in the pulmonary veins compared to those with recurrence (10.20% vs 5.19%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: