Key result
INR 2-2.5 is linked to the lowest combined stroke and ICH risk in warfarin-treated AF.
Why the study?
What is the optimal target INR range for balancing the risks of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and death in patients with atrial fibrillation taking warfarin?
Observational (n=21,883)
Yes
What is the optimal target INR range for balancing the risks of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and death in patients with atrial fibrillation taking warfarin?
In patients with atrial fibrillation taking warfarin, maintaining an INR between 2.0 and 2.5 provides the optimal balance between preventing ischemic stroke and minimizing intracranial hemorrhage and all-cause death.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support targeting INR 2-2.5 in warfarin-treated AF to minimize combined stroke-ICH risk; challenges standard 2-3 range and leaves open need for RCTs.
INTRODUCTION: A target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2-3 has been recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and risk factors for thromboembolism. This recommendation is largely based on evidence from observational studies a decade ago. This study utilized collective data from modern trials with warfarin controls to examine the relationship of warfarin anticoagulation, as assessed by INR, on the clinical outcome events of interest. METHODS: Data on warfarin-treated patients from three clinical studies supporting the approval of dabigatran (Pradaxa), apixaban (Eliquis), and edoxaban (Savaysa) were pooled. Ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and all-cause death were selected as the outcome events of interest. Multivariate Cox regression modeling was performed to examine the association between time-dependent INR and each outcome event. Benefit-risk assessment was evaluated by summing the estimated annual event rate for ischemic stroke and ICH. RESULTS: A total of 21,883 patients representing 322 ischemic strokes, 288 ICHs, and 657 all-cause deaths were included in the analysis. The models used suggest that the risk of ischemic stroke is greatly reduced when INR exceeds 2; in contrast, the risk of ICH increases monotonically as INR increases. When combining ischemic stroke and ICH events, the lowest estimated annual event rate was observed between INR of 2 and 2.5; the risk only slightly increased between INR of 1.8 and 3.0. Similarly, a U-shaped relationship between INR and the risk of all-cause death was found. CONCLUSIONS: This study using collective warfarin data from recent large prospective trials indicates that INR between 2 and 2.5 provides the best balance between ischemic stroke and ICH, as well as optimal protection against death in patients with AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McDowell et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=21,883). Warfarin was evaluated on Ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and all-cause death. In 21,883 warfarin-treated patients with atrial fibrillation, an INR between 2 and 2.5 provided the lowest combined estimated annual event rate for ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: