Why the study?
Does oral anticoagulation prevent thromboembolic complications without excessive bleeding in patients with end-stage renal disease on haemodialysis with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Does oral anticoagulation prevent thromboembolic complications without excessive bleeding in patients with end-stage renal disease on haemodialysis with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review underscores the clinical dilemma of managing AF in haemodialysis patients, where the bleeding risks of anticoagulation may outweigh unproven thromboembolic benefits.
There is an increasing understanding of the risks from atrial fibrillation (AF) in the current era. In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis, the prevalence of AF is significantly higher compared to the general population and those with earlier stages of CKD. Although anticoagulation of these patients may seem appropriate, there is a lack of conclusive evidence that it provides the same protection from thromboembolic complications as it does in patients not on dialysis. In addition, the increased risk of bleeding in patients requiring dialysis makes the use of anticoagulants less favourable. This article aims to discuss the problem of AF in dialysis patients, summarise the current evidence around the use of oral anticoagulants for AF in ESRD and provide some practical suggestions on management of AF in the haemodialysis population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parker et al. (2018) conducted a review in End-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Oral anticoagulants was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: