Key result
GDMT for HFrEF demonstrates consistent benefits across underrepresented groups including older adults, females, and minorities.
Why the study?
Despite established efficacy of HF guideline-directed medical therapies, implementation varies across underrepresented demographic groups.
Does guideline-directed medical therapy have consistent treatment effects in underrepresented demographic groups with HFrEF?
Does guideline-directed medical therapy have consistent treatment effects in underrepresented demographic groups with HFrEF?
This review highlights that HFrEF guideline-directed medical therapies have consistent benefits across diverse demographic groups, supporting broad implementation to improve health equity.
Supports equitable GDMT use in diverse HFrEF populations; extends evidence but leaves open dedicated prospective trials.
Despite the established efficacy of heart failure (HF) guideline-directed medical therapies, implementation varies across demographic groups, including Black, Indigenous, and people of color, older adults, females, and those who are socioeconomically deprived. This review synthesizes the representativeness of trial participants and describes subgroup analyses from pivotal trials in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). It reviews the largely consistent treatment effect of medical therapies across the demographic groups represented in trials. It makes arguments for broad implementation of therapies based on these data, while calling for more representative trials to improve research and health equity in HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baudry et al. (2024) conducted a review in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=100,000). Guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) vs. Placebo or standard treatment was evaluated on Treatment effect consistency across demographic subgroups. Guideline-directed medical therapies for HFrEF demonstrate consistent treatment benefits across underrepresented demographic groups, including older adults, females, and racial minorities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: