Cultural differences in individualism and collectivism (I‐C) describe important variations in how the self relates to others, but existing scales may be too broad‐band to precisely measure this aspect of I‐C. They also do not distinguish among particular ingroups and types of interdependence with them. The Circles of Closeness scale addresses these limitations. Initial results from Euro‐American, Asian‐American, Dutch, Turkish, and Japanese samples of college students are presented. The scales have high alpha reliability. Different results were obtained for three ingroups – immediate family, relatives, and friends – and six closeness types – emotional, supportive, identity, reputational, similarity, and harmony. These factors significantly interacted with each other, arguing for a more differentiated view of I‐C.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uleman et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: