Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Onora O'Neill has argued that an obligations-based anthropocentric ethics can support strong environmentalism. However, the value that non-human nature has in such ethics is still ultimately instrumental. I will argue in this paper that while O'Neill's ethics is conceptually close enough to Confucian role-based ethics, the latter allows that non-human nature can have a non-instrumental value and thus can support a robust environmentalism while remaining anthropocentric.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. T. Nuyen (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: