Key result
Catheter ablation cuts AF recurrence ~91% vs permanent pacemakers in tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome, reducing stroke and mortality.
Why the study?
Differences in clinical outcomes between catheter ablation and pacemaker treatments for tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome needed evaluation and comparison.
Does catheter ablation reduce AF recurrence, stroke, and mortality compared to permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,266)
Does catheter ablation reduce AF recurrence, stroke, and mortality compared to permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome?
Effect estimate: OR 0.09 (95% CI 0.04-0.22)
p-value: p=<0.001
Catheter ablation is associated with significantly lower rates of AF recurrence, stroke, and mortality compared to permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome.
May support preferring ablation over pacemaker implantation in tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome; leaves open confirmation by randomized trials.
• Ablation linked to lower incidence of AF recurrence, stroke, and mortality in TBS. • Ablation may contribute to sinus node function improvement. • Clinical outcomes support ablation as an alternative strategy in TBS. Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome (TBS) is a clinical disorder resulting from complications associated with sick sinus syndrome (SSS). In patients with SSS, TBS is marked by alternating episodes of tachycardia and bradycardia. This meta -analysis aims to evaluate and compare the differences in clinical outcomes between ablation and pacemaker treatments for TBS. We performed a systematic search on libraries, including PubMed, EuropePMC, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central, and medRxiv, for preprint studies. The search terms used were “Tachycardia Bradycardia Syndrome,” “Pacing,” and “Ablation” between the pacing and ablation groups in TBS patients. Review Manager Software Version 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration) was used to perform the meta -analysis. We identified 1,138 potential articles from our search, and 521 duplicates were removed. After screening the titles and abstracts of the remaining 662 articles, we obtained 23 potentially relevant articles. Finally, we included the remaining eight studies in our qualitative synthesis and meta -analysis, which comprised 1,266 patients. Catheter ablation was associated with a lower incidence of AF recurrence (OR of 0.09 [0.04, 0.22; p < 0.001], with moderate heterogeneity (I 2 = 76 %, p < 0.001), stroke (OR of 0.28 [0.14, 0.53; p < 0.001] low heterogeneity I 2 = 0 %, p = 0.99 favouring the ablation group.) and lower mortality (OR of 0.37 [0.17, 0.80; p0.01] low heterogeneity I 2 = 0 %, p = 0.84 favouring the ablation group), compared to those who underwent pacemaker implantation in patients with TBS. Catheter ablation resulted in a lower incidence of AF recurrence, stroke, and mortality compared to the pacemaker in TBS patients. There was no difference between groups regarding procedure-related complications and cardiovascular rehospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raharjo et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome (n=1,266). Catheter ablation vs. Permanent pacemaker implantation was evaluated on AF recurrence (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.22, p=<0.001). Catheter ablation reduced AF recurrence (OR 0.09), stroke (OR 0.28), and mortality (OR 0.37) compared to permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: