PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 29, 2010Journal of Medical Internet Research66 citationsOpen Access

Consumers’ Use of Web-Based Information and Their Decisions About Multiplex Genetic Susceptibility Testing

KKKimberly A. KaphingstCMColleen M. McBrideCWChristopher H. Wade

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few data exist to inform concerns raised by online direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic susceptibility tests, such as those offered by commercial entities like 23andme, Navigenics, and DNA Direct. The Multiplex Initiative, a population-based study of healthy adults, provides the first opportunity to evaluate how use of a Web-based decision tool that conveyed information about a genetic susceptibility test influenced individuals' test decisions. OBJECTIVE: To inform the ongoing debate over whether individuals offered genetic susceptibility testing without the involvement of a health care provider (eg, through direct-to-consumer testing) can make informed decisions about testing when guided by online decision aids. METHODS: Participants were 526 members of a large health maintenance organization aged 25 to 40 years old who visited a study website. Multivariate logistic regression models were tested to examine the association of website usage with downstream test decisions. RESULTS: Participants viewed an average of 2.9 of the 4 pages introducing the multiplex test, 2.2 of the 8 pages describing the health conditions, and 3.2 of the 15 pages describing the genes. For each page viewed, participants were more likely to describe their decision-making as easy (odds ratio OR 1.04, 95% confidence interval CI 1.01-1.07) and to decide to be tested (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.11). CONCLUSIONS: Healthy adults in this study perceived Web-based genomic information presented using evidence-based communications approaches to be helpful in supporting both decisions to test and not to test. Continued research is needed to ensure that these results generalize to target groups with lower literacy and less Internet savvy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kaphingst et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f78a88090e499da5fd0eahttps://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1587
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers2010 · 113 citations
  2. 2Direct-to-consumer online genetic testing and the four principles: an analysis of the ethical issues.2006 · 44 citations
  3. 3Proposed Model of the Relationship of Risk Information Seeking and Processing to the Development of Preventive Behaviors1999 · 1,189 citations
  4. 4The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.1986 · 72,270 citations
  5. 5Applied logistic regression1990 · 35,651 citations