Key result
Erector spinae plane block yields similar intraoperative hypotension versus thoracic paravertebral block during VATS.
Why the study?
Postoperative pain remains challenging after VATS, and concerns over risks with thoracic epidural blocks have shifted interest toward TPVB and ESPB, prompting a comparison of their effects on intraoperative hypotension and hemodynamic stability.
Does ESPB compared to TPVB reduce intraoperative hypotension in patients undergoing elective VATS?
RCT (n=50)
placebo-blinded
randomized
No
Does ESPB compared to TPVB reduce intraoperative hypotension in patients undergoing elective VATS?
Absolute Event Rate: 14% vs 12%
p-value: p=0.671
ESPB is a viable, technically simpler alternative to TPVB for VATS that provides comparable intraoperative hemodynamic stability.
Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) provides benefits such as fewer complications and shorter hospital stays, but postoperative pain remains a challenge. While thoracic epidural block (TEB) was once the standard, concerns over risks have shifted interest toward thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB). This study compares ESPB and TPVB, focusing on intraoperative hypotension (IOH), and its impact on hemodynamic stability. In this single-center, prospective, placebo-blinded trial, 50 elective VATS patients were randomized to receive either sham TPVB with active ESPB or sham ESPB with active TPVB at T5. The primary outcome was IOH, defined as a 20% decrease in systolic blood pressure from induction to incision. Secondary outcomes included norepinephrine use, nausea and vomiting, and procedural duration. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square and paired t-tests (p < 0.05). Among 47 analyzed patients, IOH occurred in 14 patients in the ESPB group and 12 patients in the TPVB group (p=0.671). Norepinephrine perfusors were required on only three occasions, indicating a low incidence of severe or refractory intraoperative hypotension. Nausea and vomiting showed no significant differences, while TPVB took significantly longer to perform than ESPB (p = 0.025). ESPB appears to be a viable alternative to TPVB in VATS, offering a technically simpler approach without compromising intraoperative hemodynamic stability. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to fully understand ESPB’s mechanisms and clinical implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walser et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Elective video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) (n=50). Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) vs. Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) was evaluated on Intraoperative hypotension (IOH), defined as a 20% decrease in systolic blood pressure from induction to incision (p=0.671). Erector spinae plane block resulted in similar intraoperative hypotension compared to thoracic paravertebral block during video-assisted thoracic surgery (14 vs 12 patients; p=0.671).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: