Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
UNLABELLED: Colonoscopy is one of the most frequently performed outpatient procedures in the United States. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that a remifentanil infusion would be superior to boluses of meperidine in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy. One hundred ASA physical status I-IV patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized in this double-blinded study to receive either remifentanil infusions (n = 49) or titrated boluses of meperidine (n = 51). Patient tolerance was assessed using physiologic variables and side effects associated with opioid analgesia. Verbal pain/anxiety and patient/operator satisfaction were also assessed. As a group, the physiologic characteristics demonstrated no significant differences in the response to the colonoscopy procedure. Although the patient and operator satisfaction surveys were similar between groups, the incidences of tachycardia, hypotension, and nausea were less and the adjusted verbal pain and anxiety scores were more in the Remifentanil group compared with the Meperidine group. This study demonstrates that remifentanil and meperidine were equally well tolerated in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy when administered by an anesthesia provider. The differences in the pharmakinetics of remifentanil and meperidine most likely account for the differences noted between the two treatment groups. IMPLICATIONS: Remifentanil infusions and meperidine boluses are equally well tolerated in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy when administered by an anesthesia provider.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Philip E. Greilich
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Cesar D. Virella
VA North Texas Health Care System
James M. Rich
University of Cambridge
Anesthesia & Analgesia
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Southwestern Medical Center
VA North Texas Health Care System
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Greilich et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f7c4cfa36b6e053fcb7ae — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200101000-00016
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: