PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 20, 2019Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers23 citations

EWOM firestorm: young consumers and online community

View Full Paper
SSSasithorn SuwandeeJSJiraporn SurachartkumtonkunALAurathai Lertwannawit

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the influence of homophily in an online community and the effect of electronic word of mouth (eWOM) consensus on young consumers’ attitudes. Design/methodology/approach This study implemented an experimental research design using a two (low/high homophily) × two (low/high eWOM consensus) mixed factorial design. This study explores young consumers’ changes in brand attitude after encountering negative eWOM. Findings The results indicate that a high consensus of negative eWOM among online community members leads to significant changes in attitude, while a low consensus of negative eWOM does not produce such an effect. Negative eWOM from either high or low homophilous sources produces significant changes in attitude. There are significant attitude changes when a strong consensus of negative eWOM is received from a source with a high level of homophily. Research limitations/implications Service failures in offline service settings lead to the dissemination of negative eWOM on social media. To handle and prevent social media crises, researchers should understand online crises antecedents relating to information characteristics i.e. eWOM consensus and characteristics of online community members to evaluate the crises impact. Brands should monitor tone and dialogue of online community member on social media to remedy and diminish any damage done to their brand image from negative eWOM. Originality/value This study contributes to the application of social network theory by understanding the role of nodes on negative eWOM effect in social media.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suwandee et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f7d6d9e54838161fcc959https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-03-2019-0982
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange1996 · 980 citations
  2. 2Cognitive Dissonance in Groups: The Consequences of Disagreement.2005 · 307 citations
  3. 3Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing the weight matrix2002 · 610 citations
  4. 4Models of Network Structure1980 · 820 citations
  5. 5Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior1987 · 2,398 citations