We present results from cross-correlating Planck CMB lensing maps with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) galaxy lensing shape catalog and BOSS galaxy catalogs. For galaxy position vs. CMB lensing cross-correlations, we measure the convergence signal around the galaxies in configuration space, using the BOSS LOWZ (z~0.30) and CMASS (z~0.57) samples. With fixed Planck 2015 cosmology, doing a joint fit with the galaxy clustering measurement, for the LOWZ (CMASS) sample we find a galaxy bias bg=1.75±0.04 (1.95± 0.02) and galaxy-matter cross-correlation coefficient rcc=1.0±0.2 (0.8± 0.1) using 20<rₚ<70h⁻¹Mpc, consistent with results from galaxy-galaxy lensing. Using the same scales and including the galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements, we constrain Ωₘ=0.284±0.024 and relative calibration bias between the CMB lensing and galaxy lensing to be b_γ=0.82+0.15-0.14. The combination of galaxy lensing and CMB lensing also allows us to measure the cosmological distance ratios (with zₗ~0.3, zₛ~0.5) R=Dₛ Dl,*D_* Dl,s=2.68±0.29, consistent with predictions from the Planck 2015 cosmology (R=2.35). We detect the galaxy position-CMB convergence cross-correlation at small scales, rₚ<1h⁻¹Mpc, and find consistency with lensing by NFW halos of mass Mₕ~10¹³h⁻¹M_. Finally, we measure the CMB lensing-galaxy shear cross-correlation, finding an amplitude of A=0.76±0.23 (zₑff=0.35, θ<2^∘) with respect to Planck 2015 ΛCDM predictions (1σ-level consistency). We do not find evidence for relative systematics between the CMB and SDSS galaxy lensing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: