Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a recent paper for the Journal of African History, A.G. Hopkins writes that economists have spent the last decade writing a “new” economic history of Africa that has escaped the notice of historians. He labels the “ethnolinguistic fractionalization” and “reversal of fortune” theses as this literature's key insights. In this paper, I shall argue that the most valuable contributions to the new economic history of Africa are not distinguished by their broad theories, but by their careful focus on causal inference. I shall survey recent contributions to this literature, compare them with the “old” economic history of Africa, and revise Hopkins's advice to historians accordingly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James Fenske (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: