Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To develop a classification model using texture features and support vector machine in contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images to differentiate between brain metastasis and radiation necrosis. METHODS: Texture features were extracted from 115 lesions: 32 of them previously diagnosed as radiation necrosis, 23 as radiation-treated metastasis and 60 untreated metastases; including a total of 179 features derived from six texture analysis methods. A feature selection technique based on support vector machine was used to obtain a subset of features that provide optimal performance. RESULTS: The highest classification accuracy evaluated over test sets was achieved with a subset of ten features when the untreated metastases were not considered; and with a subset of seven features when the classifier was trained with untreated metastases and tested on treated ones. Receiver operating characteristic curves provided area-under-the-curve (mean ± standard deviation) of 0.94 ± 0.07 in the first case, and 0.93 ± 0.02 in the second. CONCLUSION: High classification accuracy (AUC > 0.9) was obtained using texture features and a support vector machine classifier in an approach based on conventional MRI to differentiate between brain metastasis and radiation necrosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larroza et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: