In this paper, we measure the ellipticities of 30 low surface brightness (LSB) dwarf irregular (dI) galaxies and compare the ellipticity distribution with that of 80 dwarf elliptical (dEs) and 62 blue-compact dwarfs (BCDs). We nd that the ellipticity distribution of LSB dIs is very similar to that of BCDs, and marginally di erent from that of dEs. We then determine the distribution of intrinsic shapes of dI galaxies and compare this to the distributions of other types of dwarf galaxies under various assumptions. First, we assume that LSB dIs are either all oblate or all prolate, and use a nonparametric analysis to nd the best-tting distribution of intrinsic shapes. With this assumption, we nd that the scarcity of nearly circular LSB dIs implies, at the 99% condence level, that they cannot be a population of randomly oriented oblate or prolate objects, implying that LSB dIs are highly unlikely to be disk-shaped systems. Next, we assume that dIs are triaxial, and use a parametric analysis to nd permissible distributions of intrinsic shapes. We nd that if the intrinsic axis ratios b and c are distributed according to a Gaussian with means and and a common standard deviation of p, the best-tting set of parameters b 0 c 0 for LSB dIs is p) \ (0.66, 0.50, 0.15), and the best t for BCDs is p) \ (0.66, 0.55, 0.16), (b 0 , c 0 , ( b 0 , c 0 , while the best t for dEs is p) \ (0.78, 0.69, 0.24). The dIs and BCDs thus have very similar (b 0 , c 0 , shape distributions, given this triaxial hypothesis, while the dEs peak at a somewhat more spherical shape. Therefore, our results provide strong observational evidence to support the evolutionary scenario in which the three types of dwarf galaxy have a close relation with each other.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sung et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: