Human speakers plan and deliver their utterances incrementally, piece-by-piece, and it is obvious that their choice regarding phonetic details (and the details' peculiarities) is rarely determined by globally optimal solutions. In contrast, parametric speech synthesizers use a full-utterance context when optimizing vocoding parameters and when determing HMM states. Apart from being cognitively implausible, this impedes incremental use-cases, where the future context is often at least partially unavailable. This paper investigates the `locality' of features in parametric speech synthesis voices and takes some missing steps towards better HMM state selection and prosody modelling for incremental speech synthesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Timo Baumann (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: