Key result
Post-infarction rotigaptide reduces arrhythmia scores ~56% on programmed electrical stimulation versus control.
Why the study?
Survivors of myocardial infarction are at increased risk of late ventricular arrhythmias, and whether gap junction enhancement during infarction-reperfusion modulates structural and electrophysiological remodeling to reduce late arrhythmogenesis was investigated.
Does rotigaptide administration for 7 days post-infarction reduce late arrhythmogenesis and improve myocardial architecture in male Sprague-Dawley rats after myocardial infarction-reperfusion?
Does rotigaptide administration for 7 days post-infarction reduce late arrhythmogenesis and improve myocardial architecture in male Sprague-Dawley rats after myocardial infarction-reperfusion?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.4% vs 3.2%
p-value: p=0.018
Enhancement of gap junction function with rotigaptide early after reperfused MI reduces late infarct scar complexity and inducible arrhythmias in a rat model.
Rotigaptide may reduce post-MI inducible arrhythmias in rats; leaves open translation to human trials.
Background Survivors of myocardial infarction are at increased risk of late ventricular arrhythmias, with infarct size and scar heterogeneity being key determinants of arrhythmic risk. Gap junctions facilitate the passage of small ions and morphogenic cell signaling between myocytes. We hypothesized that gap junctions enhancement during infarction–reperfusion modulates structural and electrophysiological remodeling and reduces late arrhythmogenesis. Methods and Results Infarction–reperfusion surgery was carried out in male Sprague‐Dawley rats followed by 7 days of rotigaptide or saline administration. The in vivo and ex vivo arrhythmogenicity was characterized by programmed electrical stimulation 3 weeks later, followed by diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging and Masson's trichrome histology. Three weeks after 7‐day postinfarction administration of rotigaptide, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation was induced on programmed electrical stimulation in 20% and 53% of rats, respectively (rotigaptide versus control), resulting in reduction of arrhythmia score (3.2 versus 1.4, P =0.018), associated with the reduced magnetic resonance imaging parameters fractional anisotropy (fractional anisotropy: −5% versus −15%; P =0.062) and mean diffusivity (mean diffusivity: 2% versus 6%, P =0.042), and remodeling of the 3‐dimensional laminar structure of the infarct border zone with reduction of the mean (16° versus 19°, P =0.013) and the dispersion (9° versus 12°, P =0.015) of the myofiber transverse angle. There was no change in ECG features, spontaneous arrhythmias, or mortality. Conclusions Enhancement of gap junctions function by rotigaptide administered during the early healing phase in reperfused infarction reduces later complexity of infarct scar morphology and programmed electrical stimulation–induced arrhythmias, and merits further exploration as a feasible and practicable intervention in the acute myocardial infarction management to reduce late arrhythmic risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chowdhury et al. (2021) studied Myocardial infarction-reperfusion. Rotigaptide vs. Saline was evaluated on Arrhythmia score on programmed electrical stimulation (p=0.018). Rotigaptide administration for 7 days post-infarction reduced the arrhythmia score on programmed electrical stimulation compared to control (1.4 vs 3.2, P=0.018).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: