Key result
AI-assisted robotic surgery alters operative times and blood loss vs conventional surgery but not recovery.
Why the study?
Surgery carries high risks and complications, prompting a systematic review to analyze and validate previous research on artificial intelligence in surgery.
Does robotic assisted surgery using AI improve procedural metrics and recovery outcomes compared to normal conventional surgery?
Systematic Review
Does robotic assisted surgery using AI improve procedural metrics and recovery outcomes compared to normal conventional surgery?
AI-assisted robotic surgery demonstrates significant improvements in procedural metrics like operating time and blood loss compared to conventional surgery, though hospital stay and recovery time remain similar.
Surgery is a high-risk procedure of therapy and is associated to post trauma complications of longer hospital stay, estimated blood loss and long duration of surgeries. Reports have suggested that over 2.5% patients die during and post operation. This paper is aimed at systematic review of previous research on artificial intelligence (AI) in surgery, analyzing their results with suitable software to validate their research by obtaining same or contrary results. Six published research articles have been reviewed across three continents. These articles have been re-validated using software including SPSS and MedCalc to obtain the statistical features such as the mean, standard deviation, significant level, and standard error. From the significant values, the experiments are then classified according to the null (p < 0.05) or alternative (p>0.05) hypotheses. The results obtained from the analysis have suggested significant difference in operating time, docking time, staging time, and estimated blood loss but show no significant difference in length of hospital stay, recovery time and lymph nodes harvested between robotic assisted surgery using AI and normal conventional surgery. From the evaluations, this research suggests that AI-assisted surgery improves over the conventional surgery as safer and more efficient system of surgery with minimal or no complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nwoye et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Surgery. Robotic assisted surgery using AI vs. Normal conventional surgery was evaluated on Operating time, docking time, staging time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, recovery time and lymph nodes harvested. Robotic assisted surgery using AI significantly differed from conventional surgery in operating time, docking time, staging time, and blood loss, but not in hospital stay or recovery time.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: