Key result
Inhaled delivery systems offer targeted PAH therapy with potentially fewer systemic side effects.
Why the study?
Despite recent treatment advancements, the outlook for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension remains mediocre, prompting examination of new targeted therapies administered via inhalation.
This review summarizes the current landscape of inhaled drug delivery for pulmonary arterial hypertension, emphasizing the need for further clinical trials to validate the safety and efficacy of these targeted therapies.
Offers potential new PAH delivery route; leaves open randomized trial validation of efficacy and safety.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a serious condition in which there is increased blood pressure in arteries of the lungs (pulmonary arteries). The therapies or drugs for PAH have expanded with the revelation of three key pathological processes - encompassing prostacyclin, nitric oxide (NO), and endothelin pathways. An outlook for patients suffering from PAH is still mediocre amidst recent advancements. The evolution of pre-clinical and clinical research on PAH has facilitated the identification of several new targeted therapies for the disease. In this article, we examine recent data on new pulmonary hypertension physiological pathways, primarily concentrating on administering drugs through the inhalation route and their effects. Although they have been given clinical use approval, medications based on these routes are presently being studied in clinical or pre-clinical settings. To confirm these innovative medicines' therapeutic efficacy and safety, extensive clinical trials are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumbhare et al. (2022) conducted a review in Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Inhaled drug delivery systems was evaluated. Inhaled drug delivery systems offer a promising approach for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension by providing targeted therapy with potentially fewer systemic side effects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: