Key result
CMR aids structural aortic valve procedures by quantifying cardiac function and assessing the myocardium.
Why the study?
Despite being the gold standard for assessing left ventricular mass, volume, and function, CMR is not routinely performed in patients undergoing structural aortic valve procedures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CMR provides valuable pre- and post-procedural assessment for patients undergoing structural aortic valve interventions, including quantification of cardiac function and myocardial assessment.
The number of structural aortic valve procedures has increased significantly in recent years. Pre-procedural planning and follow-up with noninvasive testing are essential. Although cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for assessing left ventricular mass, volume, and function, it is not performed routinely in patients undergoing structural interventions. CMR can provide useful information for pre- and post-procedural assessment, including quantification of cardiac function, myocardial assessment, grading of the severity of valvular heart disease, and evaluation of extracardiac anatomy while avoiding the limitations of other non-invasive modalities. Here, we review the use cases, future perspectives, and limitations of CMR for patients undergoing structural aortic valve procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrández-Escarabajal et al. (2024) conducted a review in Structural aortic valve stenosis. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated. Cardiac magnetic resonance provides useful pre- and post-procedural assessment for structural aortic valve procedures, including quantification of cardiac function and myocardial assessment.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: