Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This editorial reviews 40 literature review articles published in Project Management Journal® (PMJ) between 2008 and 2024. It identifies trends in topics, methods, and impact, noting a growing interest in review-based contributions. Systematic reviews are the most cited and methodologically rigorous, whereas integrative and narrative reviews offer flexibility for complex topics. However, societal engagement remains limited. By synthesizing these patterns, the editorial emphasizes how literature reviews can shape agendas and extend their relevance. It concludes with practical recommendations to help PMJ authors design reviews that are rigorous, insightful, and aligned with evolving expectations in project management research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ke et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: