Why the study?
How should recurrent deep-vein thrombosis be diagnosed and treated in daily clinical practice?
How should recurrent deep-vein thrombosis be diagnosed and treated in daily clinical practice?
Provides practical algorithms for diagnosing and treating recurrent deep-vein thrombosis for physicians without access to specialized thrombosis centers.
Offers practical algorithms for recurrent DVT management in routine settings; leaves open prospective validation before broad adoption.
Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) is regarded a chronic disease as it often recurs. DVT affects most frequently the lower limbs and hence DVT of the leg will be the focus of this article. Whereas algorithms were developed and validated for the diagnosis of a first DVT, no such well-defined strategies exist in the case of recurrence of DVT. Likewise, the scientific evidence regarding the treatment of recurrent DVT is sparse, in particular when it comes to deciding on the duration of anticoagulation. Two typical cases of recurrent DVT, one with an unprovoked DVT and one with DVT during anticoagulation, will be presented. Based on these two clinical scenarios, algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent DVT will be put forward. The purpose of this article is to discuss strategies that can be applied in daily clinical practice by physicians who do not have access to means and measures available in specialized thrombosis centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul A. Kyrle (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: