Why the study?
Does a pharmacogenomics implementation program influence cardiologists' selection of antiplatelet therapy in stented patients with CYP2C19 loss-of-function variants?
Does a pharmacogenomics implementation program influence cardiologists' selection of antiplatelet therapy in stented patients with CYP2C19 loss-of-function variants?
Despite active notification of CYP2C19 loss-of-function variants, cardiologists tailored antiplatelet therapy for only a minority of affected stented patients.
Notification of CYP2C19 variants increased alternative prescriptions yet reached only 58% of poor metabolizers; leaves open whether broader adoption improves outcomes.
Physician responses to genomic information are vital to the success of precision medicine initiatives. We prospectively studied a pharmacogenomics implementation program for the propensity of clinicians to select antiplatelet therapy based on CYP2C19 loss-of-function variants in stented patients. Among 2,676 patients, 514 (19.2%) were found to have a CYP2C19 variant affecting clopidogrel metabolism. For the majority (93.6%) of the cohort, cardiologists received active and direct notification of CYP2C19 status. Over 12 months, 57.6% of poor metabolizers and 33.2% of intermediate metabolizers received alternatives to clopidogrel. CYP2C19 variant status was the most influential factor impacting the prescribing decision (hazard ratio [HR] in poor metabolizers 8.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] [5.4, 12.2] and HR 5.0, 95% CI [4.0, 6.3] in intermediate metabolizers), followed by patient age and type of stent implanted. We conclude that cardiologists tailored antiplatelet therapy for a minority of patients with a CYP2C19 variant and considered both genomic and nongenomic risks in their clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peterson et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: