Key result
Review outlines using DOACs alone or with antiplatelets to manage arterial disease and reduce CV events.
Why the study?
Despite advances in management, patients with cardiovascular diseases continue to have substantial risk of subsequent cardiovascular events.
Does the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) improve outcomes in patients with arterial disease?
Does the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) improve outcomes in patients with arterial disease?
This narrative review outlines considerations for incorporating DOACs into antithrombotic regimens for patients with arterial diseases to mitigate subsequent cardiovascular risk.
Informs DOAC considerations in arterial disease; leaves open optimal regimens pending dedicated RCTs.
Cardiovascular diseases including coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease were responsible for an estimated 18 million deaths in 2017. Despite advances in management over the past several decades, these patients continue to have substantial risk of subsequent cardiovascular events. We provide a narrative review of randomized clinical trials evaluating direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes, noncardioembolic ischemic stroke, embolic stroke of undetermined source, and peripheral arterial disease. In these conditions, considerations for use of single antiplatelet therapy, dual antiplatelet therapy, or low-dose DOACs used together with antiplatelet therapy are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siegal et al. (2021) conducted a review in Arterial disease (acute coronary syndromes, ischemic stroke, peripheral arterial disease). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Single or dual antiplatelet therapy was evaluated. This narrative review outlines considerations for using direct oral anticoagulants, either alone or combined with antiplatelet therapy, to manage arterial diseases and reduce cardiovascular events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: