Social work master's students (n = 152) and employed M.S.W.'s (N = 111) ranked the two sets of eighteen values of the Rokeach Value Survey (RVS). Comparisons with the rankings of subgroups of Rokeach's national probapility sample and the rankings of a random sample of Colorado NASW members support assumptions that (1) social work respondents are more liberal than the general American population and age and social class peers, and (2) Pittsburgh-area social work students and professionals possess a value system most similar to other social work respondents. The study's central prediction is confirmed by the finding of a higher Value Conservatism (VC) score for 1979-80 respondents than comparable 1975 respondets (P < 001). Sampling and statistical precautions are taken to preclude the influence of likely extraneous factors such as age, gender, and specifialization. A speculative interpretation of overall value system differences is offered, and policy questions of potential importance are listed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koeske et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: