⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

August 1, 1979Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey

Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Electronic Fetal Monitoring

H. David Banta Stephen B. Thacker

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Banta et al. (1979) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0fc6e9d8c5cf602efd24c7 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-197908000-00026

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:

1Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during laborOriginal Research · 2006 · 29 citations
2Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: A meta-analysismeta-analysis · 1995 · 303 citations
3Computerised interpretation of the fetal heart rate during labour: a randomised controlled trial (INFANT)RCT · 2018 · 27 citations
4Fetal heart rate monitoring: from Doppler to computerized analysisreview · 2016 · 15 citations
5CLINICAL VALUE OF FETAL HEART RATE MOITORINGOriginal Research · 1975 · 43 citations
6The Fetal Heart Rate Collaborative Practice ProjectOriginal Research · 2009 · 25 citations
7Protocol for a systematic review of wearable devices for antenatal fetal monitoring2025
8PORTABLE AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING DEVICES IN FETAL MEDICINE: TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS, CLINICAL APPLICATIONS, AND CURRENT LIMITATIONS2024
9Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NALFD) in Pregnancy: A Narrative ReviewObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2026
10Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Review of Evaluation and ManagementObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2026

More from Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey