Age-stratified NT-proBNP decision limits improved diagnostic performance over a single 125 ng/L cut-point for ruling out reduced left ventricular systolic function, with an overall AUC of 0.89.
Meta-Analysis (n=5,508)
Yes
Do age-stratified NT-proBNP decision limits improve diagnostic performance for ruling out suspected systolic dysfunction in primary care patients compared to a single cut-point?
5,508 symptomatic patients in primary care with suspected systolic dysfunction from 10 studies. Median age 62 years (range 18-100). Prevalence of reduced LVEF (≤40%) was 18%.
Age-stratified NT-proBNP decision limits (<50 years: 50 ng/L; 50-75 years: 75 ng/L; >75 years: 250 ng/L)
Single NT-proBNP decision value (125 ng/L or 400 ng/L for all ages)
Diagnostic performance (AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value) for ruling out reduced left ventricular systolic function (LVEF ≤40%)surrogate
Age-stratified NT-proBNP cut-offs significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy and negative predictive value for ruling out systolic heart failure in primary care compared to a single threshold.
Effect estimate: AUC 0.89
AIMS: The study evaluated the use of age-related decision limits for N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), for ruling out suspected systolic dysfunction in symptomatic patients in primary care, compared with the present standards. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were obtained from 5508 patients from 10 studies in the UK, New Zealand, Europe, and USA. All have had NT-proBNP analysis and echocardiography. The median age was 62 years (range 18-100 years) with a prevalence of reduced left ventricular systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction 75 years. Using optimized decision limits, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values (NPVs) were: 75 years (250 ng/L): 87.9, 53.7, and 92.4%, respectively. Using only a single decision value (125 ng/L for all ages) gave sensitivities of 89.1, 91.9, and 94.3%; specificities of 84.0, 69.1, and 29.3% and NPVs of 97.7, 97.6, and 93.4%. A decision value of 400 ng/L for all ages gave much lower sensitivities. CONCLUSION: In a large population of patients in primary care, the use of age-stratified NT-proBNP decision limits considerably improves performance over current standards, with an excellent NPV for exclusion of reduced left ventricular systolic function.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hildebrandt et al. (Wed,) conducted a meta-analysis in Suspected systolic dysfunction (n=5,508). Age-related decision limits for NT-proBNP vs. Single decision value (125 ng/L or 400 ng/L) was evaluated on Ruling out reduced left ventricular systolic function (LVEF ≤40%) (AUC 0.89). Age-stratified NT-proBNP decision limits improved diagnostic performance over a single 125 ng/L cut-point for ruling out reduced left ventricular systolic function, with an overall AUC of 0.89.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0fcb2f99b876232c50a8ad — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq163
Per Hildebrandt
Heart Failure & Transplant
Paul Collinson
Preventive Cardiology
Robert N. Doughty
Heart Failure & Transplant
European Heart Journal
Massachusetts General Hospital
University of Auckland
Durham University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...