Key result
Age-stratified NT-proBNP limits outperform a 125 ng/L cut-point for ruling out reduced LVEF.
Why the study?
The study evaluated whether age-related NT-proBNP decision limits improve the rule-out of suspected systolic dysfunction in symptomatic primary care patients compared with present standards.
Do age-stratified NT-proBNP decision limits improve diagnostic performance for ruling out suspected systolic dysfunction in primary care patients compared to a single cut-point?
Meta-Analysis (n=5,508)
Yes
Do age-stratified NT-proBNP decision limits improve diagnostic performance for ruling out suspected systolic dysfunction in primary care patients compared to a single cut-point?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.89
Age-stratified NT-proBNP cut-offs significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy and negative predictive value for ruling out systolic heart failure in primary care compared to a single threshold.
Age-stratified NT-proBNP thresholds may improve rule-out of systolic dysfunction in primary care; extends single-cutoff data but requires prospective validation.
AIMS: The study evaluated the use of age-related decision limits for N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), for ruling out suspected systolic dysfunction in symptomatic patients in primary care, compared with the present standards. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were obtained from 5508 patients from 10 studies in the UK, New Zealand, Europe, and USA. All have had NT-proBNP analysis and echocardiography. The median age was 62 years (range 18-100 years) with a prevalence of reduced left ventricular systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction < or =40%) of 18%. In a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, overall area under the curve (AUC) was 0.89. When looking at different age groups, AUC was highest (0.95) for <50 years, intermediate (0.90) for 50-75 years, and lowest (0.82) for >75 years. Using optimized decision limits, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values (NPVs) were: <50 years (50 ng/L): 99.2, 57.2, and 99.7%; 50-75 years (75 ng/L): 95.9, 51.0, and 96.8%; and >75 years (250 ng/L): 87.9, 53.7, and 92.4%, respectively. Using only a single decision value (125 ng/L for all ages) gave sensitivities of 89.1, 91.9, and 94.3%; specificities of 84.0, 69.1, and 29.3% and NPVs of 97.7, 97.6, and 93.4%. A decision value of 400 ng/L for all ages gave much lower sensitivities. CONCLUSION: In a large population of patients in primary care, the use of age-stratified NT-proBNP decision limits considerably improves performance over current standards, with an excellent NPV for exclusion of reduced left ventricular systolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hildebrandt et al. (2010) conducted a meta-analysis in Suspected systolic dysfunction (n=5,508). Age-related decision limits for NT-proBNP vs. Single decision value (125 ng/L or 400 ng/L) was evaluated on Ruling out reduced left ventricular systolic function (LVEF ≤40%) (AUC 0.89). Age-stratified NT-proBNP decision limits improved diagnostic performance over a single 125 ng/L cut-point for ruling out reduced left ventricular systolic function, with an overall AUC of 0.89.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: