Key result
Ranolazine reduces resting T-wave heterogeneity ~28% vs placebo in symptomatic diabetics with non-flow-limiting CAD.
Why the study?
Does ranolazine reduce T-wave heterogeneity in symptomatic diabetic patients with non-flow-limiting coronary artery stenosis?
RCT (n=16)
Double-blind
Crossover
Does ranolazine reduce T-wave heterogeneity in symptomatic diabetic patients with non-flow-limiting coronary artery stenosis?
Ranolazine reduces resting T-wave heterogeneity, an ECG marker of arrhythmogenic repolarization, in diabetic patients with non-flow-limiting coronary stenosis, independent of myocardial blood flow.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ranolazine attenuates resting T-wave heterogeneity in this population; extends RCT evidence for its electrophysiologic effects independent of ischemia.
Background Experimental evidence suggests that ranolazine decreases susceptibility to ischemia‐induced arrhythmias independent of effects on coronary artery blood flow. Objective In symptomatic diabetic patients with non–flow‐limiting coronary artery stenosis with diffuse atherosclerosis and/or microvascular dysfunction, we explored whether ranolazine reduces T‐wave heterogeneity ( TWH ), an electrocardiographic ( ECG ) marker of arrhythmogenic repolarization abnormalities shown to predict sudden cardiac death. Methods We studied all 16 patients with analyzable ECG recordings during rest and exercise tolerance testing before and after 4 weeks of ranolazine in the double‐blind, crossover, placebo‐controlled RAND ‐ CFR trial ( NCT 01754259). TWH was quantified without knowledge of treatment assignment by second central moment analysis, which assesses the interlead splay of T waves in precordial leads about a mean waveform. Myocardial blood flow ( MBF ) was measured by positron emission tomography. Results At baseline, prior to randomization, TWH during rest was 54 ± 7 μV and was not altered following placebo (47 ± 6 μV, p = .47) but was reduced by 28% (to 39 ± 5 μV, p = .002) after ranolazine. Ranolazine did not increase MBF at rest. Exercise increased TWH after placebo by 49% (to 70 ± 8 μV, p = .03). Ranolazine did not reduce TWH during exercise (to 75 ± 16 μV), and there were no differences among the groups ( p = .95, ANOVA). TWH was not correlated with MBF at rest before ( r 2 = .07, p = .36) or after ranolazine ( r 2 = .23, p = .06). Conclusions In symptomatic diabetic patients with non‐flow‐limiting coronary artery stenosis with diffuse atherosclerosis and/or microvascular dysfunction, ranolazine reduced TWH at rest but not during exercise. Reduction in repolarization abnormalities appears to be independent of alterations in MBF .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evaristo et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Symptomatic diabetes with non-flow-limiting coronary artery stenosis (n=16). Ranolazine vs. Placebo was evaluated on T-wave heterogeneity (TWH) at rest (p=0.002). Ranolazine reduced T-wave heterogeneity at rest by 28% (to 39 μV, p=0.002) compared to placebo in symptomatic diabetic patients with non-flow-limiting coronary artery stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: