Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Key points Beall's list remains a key resource in the fight against rogue publishers. Misguided criticism of Beall himself was counterproductive in the fight against fraudulent publishers. It is time to replace dispute and debate about fraudulent publishers with meaningful action. Some of the worst fraudulent publishers should be prosecuted, not simply criticized. Universities must be the agents of reform for scholarly publishing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mike Downes (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: