Why the study?
Exercise supports depression management in older adults, but the relative effectiveness of different exercise modalities remains unknown.
Does aerobic, resistance, or mind-body exercise improve depressive symptoms in adults aged ≥ 65 years?
Does aerobic, resistance, or mind-body exercise improve depressive symptoms in adults aged ≥ 65 years?
Aerobic, resistance, and mind-body exercise are equally effective in mitigating depressive symptoms in older adults, supporting the use of personal preference when prescribing exercise.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports prescribing exercise by patient preference for depressive symptoms in adults ≥65; confirms equivalence across aerobic, resistance, and mind-body modalities.
<ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Background:</ns3:bold> Exercise has been identified as an allied health strategy that can support the management of depression in older adults, yet the relative effectiveness for different exercise modalities is unknown. To meet this gap in knowledge, we present a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the head-to-head effectiveness of aerobic, resistance, and mind-body exercise to mitigate depressive symptoms in adults aged ≥ 65 years. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Methods:</ns3:bold> A PRISMA-NMA compliant review was undertaken on RCTs from inception to September 12 <ns3:sup>th</ns3:sup> , 2019. PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus were systematically searched for eligible RCTs enrolling adults with a mean age ≥ 65 years, comparing one or more exercise intervention arms, and which used valid measures of depressive symptomology. Comparative effectiveness was evaluated using network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence, controlling for inherent variation in trial control groups. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Results:</ns3:bold> The systematic review included 82 RCTs, with 69 meeting eligibility for the network meta-analysis ( <ns3:italic>n</ns3:italic> = 5,379 participants). Pooled analysis found each exercise type to be effective compared with controls (Hedges’ <ns3:italic>g</ns3:italic> = -0.27 to -0.51). Relative head-to-head comparisons were statistically comparable between exercise types: resistance versus aerobic (Hedges’ <ns3:italic>g</ns3:italic> = -0.06, <ns3:italic>PrI</ns3:italic> = -0.91, 0.79), mind-body versus aerobic (Hedges’ <ns3:italic>g</ns3:italic> = -0.12, <ns3:italic>PrI</ns3:italic> = -0.95, 0.72), mind-body versus resistance (Hedges’ <ns3:italic>g</ns3:italic> = -0.06, <ns3:italic>PrI</ns3:italic> = -0.90, 0.79). High levels of compliance were demonstrated for each exercise treatment. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Conclusions:</ns3:bold> Aerobic, resistance, and mind-body exercise demonstrate equivalence to mitigate symptoms of depression in older adults aged ≥ 65 years, with comparably encouraging levels of compliance to exercise treatment. These findings coalesce with previous findings in clinically depressed older adults to encourage personal preference when prescribing exercise for depressive symptoms in older adults. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Registration:</ns3:bold> PROSPERO <ns3:ext-link xmlns:ns4="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" ns4:href="https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018115866">CRD42018115866</ns3:ext-link> (23/11/2018). </ns3:p>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: