This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Regular engagement in physical activity (PA), reduced screen-based sedentary time, or adequate sleep duration is independently linked to cognitive benefits, but such associations in an integrated manner have been rarely investigated with longitudinal design, especially among preschoolers. Methods: this longitudinal study explored associations between 24-hour movement guideline adherence and cognitive outcomes in 157 Australian preschoolers (M = 4.48 years, SD = 0.35, 52.2% female). Using baseline parent-reported movement behaviours and direct cognitive assessments at 7-month and 1-year follow-ups, we applied linear mixed regression models, adjusted for age, sex, maternal education, family income, and continuous PA, sleep, and screen time measures. Meeting PA guidelines alone significantly predicted higher school readiness at 7 months (Estimate = 22.42, 95% CI 9.56–35.28, p = .001, d = 1.40) and 1-year follow-up (Estimate = 22.54, 95% CI 13.29–31.78, p < .001, d = 1.41), and enhanced cognitive flexibility at 1-year follow-up (Estimate = 4.01, 95% CI 2.10–5.93, p < .001, d = 0.94). Sleep guideline adherence also predicted higher flexibility 1-year follow-up (Estimate = 1.82, 95% CI 0.66–2.97, p = .002, d = 0.43). All other β estimates were non-significant after Bonferroni correction. Only 17.2% of the involved preschoolers met all guidelines. Supporting adherence to the 24-Hour Movement Guidelines could enhance school readiness within one academic year. • We used a longitudinal dataset with Australian preschool children assessed over a period of 2 years • Children have low adherence rates in 24-hour movement behaviors separately and jointly (e.g., less than 20% comply with all three guidelines). • We found positive associations between adherence to physical activity and cognitive flexibility scores at 7 months and 1-year follow-up. • We found positive associations between adherence to sleep guidelines and cognitive flexibility scores at 1 year follow up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mavilidi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: