Untapped Possibilities of Antiischemic Therapy after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Data from the PROFILE-IM Register

Aim . To evaluate the practice of prescribing antianginal/antiischemic therapy in patients who, after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), retained typical clinical manifestations of stable angina. Material and methods . The registry includes 160 patients who applied to the polyclinic from March 01, 2014 to June 30, 2015 after suffering an AMI. Anti-ischemic therapy was evaluated in patients with typical angina pectoris. Results . Based on the survey, typical angina attacks were detected in almost a quarter of patients (38 patients – 23.8%). According to the main indicators, patients with typical angina pectoris practically did not differ from the rest of the group of patients, with the exception of a significantly larger proportion of patients with diagnosed ischemic heart disease before AMI and patients under dispensary supervision. Almost all patients received beta-blockers (97.4%), about a third of patients received calcium antagonists (28.9%) or long-acting nitrates (34,2%). During the first year after AMI, second-line drugs were practically not prescribed to enhance antianginal therapy. According to international non-proprietary names, the choice of doctors tended to prescribe bisoprolol, amlodipine, and isosorbide dinitrate. Exacerbation of the disease course with hospitalization for unstable angina pectoris was recorded in 9 (23.7%) patients from the group with typical angina pectoris and in 5 (4.1%) patients in the rest of the group (p<0.001). Conclusion . In real clinical practice, only a small part of patients with typical angina pectoris receive drug therapy that corresponds to evidence-based medicine; therefore, the unique possibilities of antianginal (anti-ischemic) therapy often remain unrealized.