Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reports efficient in-situ calibration of neutron flux monitors, suggesting a viable reference strategy for fusion reactors.
This paper reports the rapid in-situ calibration of neutron flux monitors completed on the HL-3 tokamak device, a process that took only 14 h. The efficiency of the detection system, consisting of B-10 proportional counters and U-235 fission chambers, was determined at 33 positions using a Cf-252 source (8.29 × 10 6 n s −1 ). The Campbell model for high-flux measurements was cross-calibrated using plasma neutrons. This calibration system achieves a measurement range from 10 10 n s −1 to 10 17 n s −1 with a time resolution of 10 ms and an uncertainty less than 20%. The successful implementation of this efficient calibration activity, from process design to cross-validation, provides a viable reference strategy for planning neutron diagnostic systems for International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor and other future fusion reactors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: