Severity of illness does not directly predict intensive care costs across all patients, and cost savings from limiting intensive care are often overestimated.
ICU cost-containment efforts relying on severity scores may overestimate savings; leaves open identification of primary cost drivers.
The costs of caring for a critically ill patient will vary according to an individual's severity of illness. Where reimbursement is based on individual services provided, severity of illness is not an important financial consideration. Reimbursement as a global, per-case fee, as with Diagnostic Related Groups (DRG) in the United States, may not adequately recognize a hospital's cost differences between low and high risk patients. This article discusses how costs are categorized and relationships between a patient's presenting condition and expected costs. Severity-of-illness does not directly predict costs when all intensive care patients are included, but a relationship can sometimes be demonstrated within a disease category. The factors predicting costs may differ from those predicting survival. Cost savings from limiting intensive care are generally less than imagined, and limitations on intensive therapy should not be based exclusively on prognostic scoring systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas L. Higgins (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: