Pilot study identifies user preferences for trail infrastructure in Poland, suggesting a new model for sustainable planning.
Forests in Poland play a key recreational role, and the growing interest in sylvaturism requires optimized management. Despite the growing body of research on forest recreation, existing studies rarely address the role of small-scale infrastructure in shaping user preferences and its integration into spatial planning frameworks, which constitutes a research gap in this study. This study aimed to identify user preferences for small infrastructure and to develop an application-oriented, socially sensitive model for forest trail design that supports sustainable management. The research was conducted in 2021–2024 using the CAWI method on a group of 402 adult Poles. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Pearson’s chi-square tests to assess demographic differences, and correspondence analysis to identify user preference profiles. The results not only confirmed a clear hierarchy of needs but also demonstrated that differences between user groups relate primarily to the intensity rather than the structure of preferences. A clear hierarchy of needs was confirmed, with route map boards (86.32%), educational boards (72.64%), and benches (71.14%) dominating. Based on the results, a modular design model was developed (modules: basic, comfort, accessibility, and activity), which constitutes a conceptual advancement over existing planning approaches by introducing a flexible, user-oriented framework that links social preferences with spatial decision-making. By integrating empirical social data into the planning process, the proposed framework extends current knowledge on recreation planning and provides a structured basis for adaptive forest trail design. This tool could help managers efficiently channel tourist traffic, protect ecosystems, and promote public health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobyłka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: