Retrospective study compares early full weight-bearing with heel-unloader to cast treatment in calcaneal fractures, suggesting comparable outcomes.
Background Standard treatment of calcaneal fractures involves prolonged immobilization with partial weight-bearing, risking ankle stiffness and lower-leg deconditioning. The heel-unloader enables early full weight-bearing by redirecting axial load from the hindfoot to the midfoot, forefoot, and lower leg. This study compares radiologic and clinical outcomes of heel-unloader vs conventional cast immobilisation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 101 calcaneal fractures treated with cast immobilization and partial weight-bearing or a heel-unloader with early full weight-bearing. Böhler angle (BA) loss, evaluating macroscopic fracture displacement and heel height, was the primary endpoint; secondary outcomes were pain, ankle/subtalar motion, complications, and radiologically subtalar degeneration. Equivalence in BA loss was tested by 2 one-sided tests (TOST). Results Overall, 16.8% of the fractures were managed non-operatively and 83.2% operatively, with similar distributions between the groups (P = .397). After 4 weeks of non-weight-bearing, 59 (58.4%) fractures continued in a heel-unloader and 42 (41.6%) with a cast. Baseline and fracture characteristics were comparable. Mean BA loss at 12 weeks was -4.7° ± 5.3° (heel-unloader group) vs -3.8° ± 5.5° (cast group) (P = .44), confirming equivalence (TOST P < .001). Other outcomes showed no significant differences. Conclusion Early full weight-bearing with a heel-unloader yields radiologically and clinically equivalent macroscopic results to traditional casting and is a safe alternative for early mobilization. Level Of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hecht et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: