Examines output control strategies in user-generated content platforms, suggesting new governance insights.
Digital platforms provide arenas in which autonomous participants produce and consume content, and the design of their governance constitutes a critical source of firm performance. This study focuses on output control strategies in user-generated content platforms and introduces a novel theoretical framework that goes beyond the traditional quality-based approach by incorporating category-based mechanisms. Specifically, we classify output control strategies along two domains—quality and category—and introduce a fourfold typology consisting of open, quality-based, category-based, and dual control strategies. Furthermore, we examine two boundary conditions—user composition and revenue models—and conduct an agent-based simulation to compare the relative effectiveness of each strategy. This study makes two theoretical contributions. First, by incorporating participants’ within-category preferences, we establish the theoretical validity of category-based control and refine the conventional open/closed governance dichotomy. Second, we demonstrate that dual control strategies can simultaneously pursue both participant numbers and utility, offering a new perspective of compatibility that challenges the traditional view of governance strategies as a trade-off between the two. Through these contributions, this research extends the theoretical scope of platform governance studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inada et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: