Demonstrates robust safety control in autonomous vehicles, indicating improved safety under sensor faults.
Autonomous vehicles must enforce safety constraints even when their state estimates are corrupted by sensor faults and disturbances. This paper develops a separation-based robust safety-control framework that couples a fault-tolerant observer with a control barrier function (CBF) safety filter through an explicit estimation-error envelope. First, a uniformly ultimately bounded observer-error estimate is derived. This bound is then injected into an estimated-state robust CBF condition, yielding safety margins that account for both observation error and bounded disturbances. The construction is further extended to time-varying safe sets induced by moving obstacles. For implementation, the resulting condition is realized as a quadratic-program safety filter with high-order obstacle and lane constraints. Simulations on a nonlinear 3-DOF bicycle model evaluate bias faults, gust-like disturbances, dense traffic, and tightened stress tests. Compared with a standard CBF baseline and observer/safety-filter ablations, the proposed method preserves nonnegative safety margins while keeping slack activation negligible. Additional sensitivity experiments quantify the trade-off among safety margin, slack usage, observer accuracy, control conservatism, and QP computation time. The results support the proposed architecture as a practical bridge between bounded state estimation and fault-aware safety filtering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: