Study combines life-cycle assessment with expert input to improve decarbonization strategies in ports, indicating effective measures for reducing emissions.
Port decarbonization strategies often prioritize emissions under direct port authority control while overlooking dominant indirect sources. This study proposes an approach that combines Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) and expert elicitation. While existing studies often rely on descriptive emission inventories, this paper demonstrates the value of combining quantitative life-cycle data with expert judgment. The methodology is applied to the Port of Sines, Portugal’s largest port by cargo volume and handling capacity. The LCA revealed that Scope 3 emissions account for over 99% of total greenhouse gas emissions, with ocean-going vessels as the main contributors. The expert elicitation process prioritized energy-related measures such as renewable energy, alternative fuels, electrification, and energy efficiency, while onshore power supply and ship–port interface measures received lower priority. By comparing the results, the study reveals a misalignment between the most significant emission sources (Scope 3 emissions, particularly ocean-going vessels) and commonly prioritized decarbonization measures (measures addressing Scopes 1 and 2). The main contribution lies in combining LCA findings and expert inputs to actively inform strategic decision making, helping ports realign decarbonization strategies toward high-impact measures and providing transferable insights for other ports pursuing net-zero objectives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrade et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Sustainability