Study introduces pH-responsive lipid nanoparticles to enhance cisplatin delivery, suggesting improved outcomes in ovarian cancer treatment.
Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy, including cisplatin and carboplatin, is widely used to treat various cancers, including ovarian cancer. However, its clinical application is limited by dose-limiting toxicities and resistance, with a poor 5-year overall survival rate for ovarian cancer (35–40%). In this study, we used ionisable lipids and developed pH-responsive lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to address platinum-resistance in ovarian carcinoma. Methods: Cisplatin was loaded into three LNP systems containing monoolein (MO) and synthetic cationic ionisable lipids (OE-Mo, OA-Py, and OA-Pi) dispersed in Pluronic F-127 with 0.9% NaCl. Cisplatin-loaded LNPs (Cis-OE-Mo-NP, Cis-OA-Py-NP, and Cis-OA-Pi-NP) were characterised for size, zeta potential, and internal mesophase structure. Encapsulation efficiencies were determined via HPLC after removing free drug by ultrafiltration. In vivo efficacy was tested using cisplatin-resistant human patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Results: The LNPs were well dispersed with particle size of 219–250 nm and a drug loading of ~1.2 mg/mL. Encapsulation efficiencies were 62%, 59%, and 64%, for Cis-OE-Mo-NP, Cis-OA-Py-NP, and Cis-OA-Pi-NP, respectively. Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) results showed that the LNPs are pH responsive with structural transitions from a cubic to a hexagonal phase at an acidic pH. Among the tested formulations, Cis-OA-Py-NP resulted in the most significant reduction in tumour volume by ~60% compared to treatment with cisplatin alone. However, they also showed significant toxicity, including >10% weight loss and gross lung and kidney damage, as confirmed by histology. Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential of Cis-OA-Py-NP in reducing tumour volume but underscore the need for further optimisation to improve safety and therapeutic applicability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajesh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: