Key result
Anticoagulation for bioprosthetic mitral valve thrombus linked to worsening ICH after recent stroke.
Why the study?
Evidence-based protocols and data are needed to guide the timing and dosing of anticoagulation in patients with concurrent hemorrhagic stroke and prosthetic valve thrombus after CABG and MVR.
Case Report (n=1)
This case highlights the complex management of concurrent bioprosthetic valve thrombus and hemorrhagic stroke, emphasizing that anticoagulation should be delayed until intracranial stability is confirmed by serial imaging.
Highlights rare post-CABG/MVR stroke with hemorrhagic conversion and mitral thrombus; leaves open optimal antithrombotic strategies.
Cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) are a well‐documented, albeit feared, complication of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) procedures. Fortunately, CVA risk following these procedures has decreased in recent years, with reported rates of 1.2%–7.4%. We present a unique case of a large right middle cerebral artery (MCA) ischemic stroke with subsequent hemorrhagic conversion after CABG and MVR, further complicated by a thrombus on the replaced mitral valve. The patient is a 60‐year‐old man with a past medical history significant for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (ejection fraction 25%–35%), severe mitral regurgitation, cannabis use, and coronary artery disease who presented for an elective bioprosthetic MVR. The patient underwent an MVR with a 27 mm bioprosthetic valve and CABG. Postoperatively, he developed an ischemic stroke, concerning for embolic etiology of unknown source, which underwent hemorrhagic transformation. Stroke workup revealed a thrombus on the replaced mitral valve. Through multispecialty discussion, a decision was made to attempt anticoagulation for secondary prevention of another stroke. Repeat computed tomography (CT) revealed worsening of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). This created a complex scenario where the patient needed anticoagulation but was not able to because of the hemorrhagic stroke. The patient was eventually discharged to a rehabilitation facility on postoperative day 38. Further research is needed to refine perioperative stroke prevention and develop evidence‐based protocols for anticoagulation timing and dosing in patients with concurrent hemorrhagic stroke and valve thrombus. Valve thrombus characteristics and hemodynamic impact should guide therapy, and anticoagulation should not begin until intracranial stability is confirmed through serial imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patton et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Ischemic stroke with hemorrhagic transformation and concurrent mitral valve thrombus following CABG and bioprosthetic MVR (n=1). Anticoagulation was evaluated. Anticoagulation for a bioprosthetic mitral valve thrombus following CABG and MVR in a patient with a recent ischemic stroke resulted in worsening of intracranial hemorrhage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: