Randomized trial reveals two-step phase transition structure in large language models, suggesting new control mechanisms for inference failures.
This study formalizes the empirical discovery of the Double Criticality Structure in Large Language Models (LLMs) subjected to continuous embedding-space perturbations. Using the PhaseL v2.0 measurement stack on Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 (K=30 ensemble samples, RTX 4090), we demonstrate that LLM inference failure is not a gradual decay but a two-step first-order phase transition bounded by two critical points: δ_c1 (Stable → Nonlinear): onset of nonlinear manifold deformationδ_c2 (Nonlinear → Collapsed): rank collapse to a degenerate attractor Key findings:(1) First-order transition confirmed: power-law scaling rejected (R²=0.157, γ=0.086±0.041); hysteresis area A_hyst=1.623>1.0 via bidirectional sweep.(2) Full reproducibility: both critical points detected at 100% rate across N=5 independent trials per model (LLaMA: δ_c1=0.340±0.049, δ_c2=1.020±0.075; Mistral: δ_c1=0.100±0.000, δ_c2=0.400±0.000).(3) Model-specific phase fingerprint: LLaMA-3-8B is 3.4× more robust than Mistral-7B under representation-space perturbation.(4) Temperature control: δ_c1 is temperature-invariant (geometric origin); δ_c2 is thermally activated and completely suppressed at τ<0.3 (Phase-Safe Inference protocol). This repository includes the full experimental code (PhaseL v2.0), raw data (.npz), figures, and LaTeX source.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
tomohiko nakamura (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: